Why does the resolve message appear first?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    yesterday






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    yesterday






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    yesterday






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    yesterday






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    yesterday


















11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    yesterday






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    yesterday






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    yesterday






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    yesterday






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    yesterday














11












11








11


3






I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question
















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}






javascript es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Boann

37.5k1291123




37.5k1291123










asked yesterday









EdwinEdwin

614




614








  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    yesterday






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    yesterday






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    yesterday






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    yesterday






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    yesterday














  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    yesterday






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    yesterday






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    yesterday






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    yesterday






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    yesterday








3




3





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
yesterday





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
yesterday




5




5





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
yesterday





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
yesterday




2




2





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
yesterday





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
yesterday




5




5





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
yesterday





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
yesterday




1




1





I'd add that 1% to that.

– Michał Kapracki
yesterday





I'd add that 1% to that.

– Michał Kapracki
yesterday












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday



















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    yesterday






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    yesterday



















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    21 hours ago











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    21 hours ago



















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    yesterday












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday
















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday














4












4








4







You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









ludovicoludovico

936




936













  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday



















  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday

















i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
yesterday





i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
yesterday













2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    yesterday






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    yesterday
















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    yesterday






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    yesterday














2












2








2







The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer













The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Esdras XavierEsdras Xavier

45017




45017








  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    yesterday






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    yesterday














  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    yesterday






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    yesterday








1




1





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
yesterday





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
yesterday




1




1





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
yesterday





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
yesterday











0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    21 hours ago











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    21 hours ago
















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    21 hours ago











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    21 hours ago














0












0








0







Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer













Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Yanis-gitYanis-git

2,6271725




2,6271725













  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    21 hours ago











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    21 hours ago



















  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    yesterday











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    21 hours ago











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    21 hours ago

















@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
yesterday





@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
yesterday













Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

– Edwin
21 hours ago





Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

– Edwin
21 hours ago













you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

– Yanis-git
21 hours ago





you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

– Yanis-git
21 hours ago











0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    yesterday
















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    yesterday














0












0








0







I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer















I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 21 hours ago

























answered yesterday









EdwinEdwin

614




614













  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    yesterday



















  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    yesterday

















I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
yesterday





I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b