Part or parts, When to be used?
I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part'
nouns uncountable-nouns
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part'
nouns uncountable-nouns
New contributor
1
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
2
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
1
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part'
nouns uncountable-nouns
New contributor
I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'mail in parts' or I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part'
nouns uncountable-nouns
nouns uncountable-nouns
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
DojDoj
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
1
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
2
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
1
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
2
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
1
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
1
1
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
2
2
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
1
1
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The first one is correct. The article "the" is necessary in English, and "in part" means only a portion of it will ever arrive.
But if you are not sending a bag of US mail or similar, if you are mailing single groups of things to single individuals or institutions, it will sound better if you go with "I apologize for the inconvenience, but I will have to mail the /Name Of Item/ in parts" OR "I will have to send the parts in separate mailings", the first if you are sending one package, or if all packages are fully expected to arrive together, or the second if you are sending separate packages. But use "in separate portions" instead of "in parts" if you are sending something like media or food (as opposed to something that must be assembled, or collectibles, or other things that will be used together).
New contributor
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Doj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490331%2fpart-or-parts-when-to-be-used%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The first one is correct. The article "the" is necessary in English, and "in part" means only a portion of it will ever arrive.
But if you are not sending a bag of US mail or similar, if you are mailing single groups of things to single individuals or institutions, it will sound better if you go with "I apologize for the inconvenience, but I will have to mail the /Name Of Item/ in parts" OR "I will have to send the parts in separate mailings", the first if you are sending one package, or if all packages are fully expected to arrive together, or the second if you are sending separate packages. But use "in separate portions" instead of "in parts" if you are sending something like media or food (as opposed to something that must be assembled, or collectibles, or other things that will be used together).
New contributor
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
The first one is correct. The article "the" is necessary in English, and "in part" means only a portion of it will ever arrive.
But if you are not sending a bag of US mail or similar, if you are mailing single groups of things to single individuals or institutions, it will sound better if you go with "I apologize for the inconvenience, but I will have to mail the /Name Of Item/ in parts" OR "I will have to send the parts in separate mailings", the first if you are sending one package, or if all packages are fully expected to arrive together, or the second if you are sending separate packages. But use "in separate portions" instead of "in parts" if you are sending something like media or food (as opposed to something that must be assembled, or collectibles, or other things that will be used together).
New contributor
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
The first one is correct. The article "the" is necessary in English, and "in part" means only a portion of it will ever arrive.
But if you are not sending a bag of US mail or similar, if you are mailing single groups of things to single individuals or institutions, it will sound better if you go with "I apologize for the inconvenience, but I will have to mail the /Name Of Item/ in parts" OR "I will have to send the parts in separate mailings", the first if you are sending one package, or if all packages are fully expected to arrive together, or the second if you are sending separate packages. But use "in separate portions" instead of "in parts" if you are sending something like media or food (as opposed to something that must be assembled, or collectibles, or other things that will be used together).
New contributor
The first one is correct. The article "the" is necessary in English, and "in part" means only a portion of it will ever arrive.
But if you are not sending a bag of US mail or similar, if you are mailing single groups of things to single individuals or institutions, it will sound better if you go with "I apologize for the inconvenience, but I will have to mail the /Name Of Item/ in parts" OR "I will have to send the parts in separate mailings", the first if you are sending one package, or if all packages are fully expected to arrive together, or the second if you are sending separate packages. But use "in separate portions" instead of "in parts" if you are sending something like media or food (as opposed to something that must be assembled, or collectibles, or other things that will be used together).
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered yesterday
PvtBuddiePvtBuddie
3475
3475
New contributor
New contributor
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
Thanks PvtBuddie. To improvise the nitty-gritty in grammar, is there any good book out there?
– Doj
23 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
The only grammar books I've read are "Eats, Shoots & Leaves" by Lynn Truss, and one called "You You Don't Say" which I think is the one by Tom Parks. Most of what I put in the second paragraph, though, is based on common word usage, not on rules of grammar.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
Thanks mate, for your suggestions.
– Doj
22 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
I could find eats, shoots & leaves in PDF version but couldn't find the e-version of second book. Do you have PDF version or any other format of it.
– Doj
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
No, I don't. Comments must be at least 15 characters.
– PvtBuddie
21 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Doj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Doj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490331%2fpart-or-parts-when-to-be-used%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Which do you mean? What are you doing?
– Hot Licks
yesterday
2
How many parts did you actually send? If you only sent a partial piece of mail, then the singular would work. But if you sent multiple pieces, then you want the plural.
– Jason Bassford
23 hours ago
1
I send the attachments in 3 mails. So, in my last mail I had written I regret the inconvenience for sending 'the mail in part. Is it okay?
– Doj
22 hours ago
It's better if you don't wait to enclose the apology until the last package, unless you have already warned the person receiving the mailing (it's not a mail, but a package or a mailing) before the packages were sent at all. Many people are also "feather-headed", a word you will understand when I say that you should enclose a reminder in the first package that the rest of the item (a purchase, I presume?), will follow. If you are looking for a notice to enclose in the last package, please change my suggested "inconvenience, but I will have to mail/send" to "inconvenience of mailing/sending".
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago
Either way, if you have already sent it they will understand your notice, and they will likely appreciate your effort and consideration.
– PvtBuddie
22 hours ago