When introducing an initialism for the first time in a paper, but the noun is possessive, do I make the...
E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."
Or
"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."
writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting
New contributor
add a comment |
E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."
Or
"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."
writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting
New contributor
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
1
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday
add a comment |
E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."
Or
"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."
writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting
New contributor
E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."
Or
"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."
writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting
writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
BradyBrady
6
6
New contributor
New contributor
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
1
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday
add a comment |
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
1
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
1
1
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Brady is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491413%2fwhen-introducing-an-initialism-for-the-first-time-in-a-paper-but-the-noun-is-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.
New contributor
add a comment |
I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.
New contributor
add a comment |
I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.
New contributor
I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
ElliotElliot
151
151
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Brady is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brady is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brady is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Brady is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491413%2fwhen-introducing-an-initialism-for-the-first-time-in-a-paper-but-the-noun-is-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
1
Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!
– David
2 days ago
I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.
– Anton Sherwood
yesterday