The interrogative pronoun “who” without using the auxiliary “did” in a question [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
1) Talking to a teacher friend of mine, he considered correct questions like: "who needed it?" or "who studied for the test?"
2) Is he really right? Asking in the most usual way like "who did need it?" or "who did study for the test?", is correct, too?
3) Is there a rule in grammar that explains item 1 if it is right?
Thank you very much.
auxiliary-verbs
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Dan Bron, Jim, Mark Beadles, Centaurus yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles, Centaurus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
1) Talking to a teacher friend of mine, he considered correct questions like: "who needed it?" or "who studied for the test?"
2) Is he really right? Asking in the most usual way like "who did need it?" or "who did study for the test?", is correct, too?
3) Is there a rule in grammar that explains item 1 if it is right?
Thank you very much.
auxiliary-verbs
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Dan Bron, Jim, Mark Beadles, Centaurus yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles, Centaurus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
5
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
1
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
1) Talking to a teacher friend of mine, he considered correct questions like: "who needed it?" or "who studied for the test?"
2) Is he really right? Asking in the most usual way like "who did need it?" or "who did study for the test?", is correct, too?
3) Is there a rule in grammar that explains item 1 if it is right?
Thank you very much.
auxiliary-verbs
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1) Talking to a teacher friend of mine, he considered correct questions like: "who needed it?" or "who studied for the test?"
2) Is he really right? Asking in the most usual way like "who did need it?" or "who did study for the test?", is correct, too?
3) Is there a rule in grammar that explains item 1 if it is right?
Thank you very much.
auxiliary-verbs
auxiliary-verbs
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
jogefonfi
41
41
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
jogefonfi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Dan Bron, Jim, Mark Beadles, Centaurus yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles, Centaurus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Dan Bron, Jim, Mark Beadles, Centaurus yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles, Centaurus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
5
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
1
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday
add a comment |
5
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
1
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday
5
5
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
1
1
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
5
He is right, this is the normal way to phrase those questions. For more detailed analysis of the grammar, the why, we will migrate this post to our more specialized sister site, English Language Learners.
– Dan Bron
yesterday
1
You may be getting things mixed up with cases where who(m) is an object in the sentence, rather than the subject. In such cases, do-support is indeed the norm (“Who(m) did you see?”, “Who(m) are you talking to?”). Not when who is the subject, though: do-support sounds very unnatural there, unless you’re using it to emphasise the verb (“So you didn’t study, and you didn’t study, and he didn’t study, and I didn’t study either… so who did study for the test?”).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday